Opened 6 years ago

Closed 4 years ago

#149 closed change (rejected)

[Typed objects] Implement dictionary types

Reported by: trev Assignee: trev
Priority: P5 Milestone:
Module: Core Keywords:
Cc: Blocked By: #150
Blocking: #145 Platform:
Ready: yes Confidential: no
Tester: Verified working: no
Review URL(s):

Description

Background

See #145.

What to change

Dictionary types with string keys and same-type values need to be implemented.

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by trev

  • Blocked By 150 added

comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by trev

  • Owner set to trev
  • Ready set

comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by fhd

  • Priority changed from P2 to P5

Since the Emscripten based approach is looking rather good, I'm not sure we really want to continue to work on Typed Objects. Makes it a P5.

comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by trev

  • Resolution set to rejected
  • Status changed from new to closed

In fact, at that point I am certain that we are dropping typed objects and go with Emscripten instead. The performance issues we had with Emscripten initially are bound to affect us with typed objects as well (important points: static generation of JS bindings, stack-based allocations, likely more). Fixing these issues was already non-trivial with Emscripten, but with our own toolchain it will require far more effort - this isn't going to pay off if we have a reasonable and maintained alternative.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.