Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #6581, comment 39


Ignore:
Timestamp:
04/18/2018 03:58:41 PM (20 months ago)
Author:
mjethani
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #6581, comment 39

    initial v1  
    1818I meant that you can write a perfectly fine program in JavaScript without a single use of `const`. Since it doesn't bring much value to the table, it's not worth using it if it comes at such a cost (i.e. lengthy discussions). 
    1919 
    20 We have 3 options: (1) never use `const` (as if it doesn't exist); (2) use `const` whenever possible'; (3) use `const` whenever it makes sense. 
     20We have 3 options: (1) never use `const` (as if it doesn't exist); (2) use `const` whenever possible; (3) use `const` whenever it makes sense. 
    2121 
    2222> > In that case we should just use `let` everywhere.