Opened on 07/08/2014 at 05:26:38 AM
Closed on 07/08/2014 at 08:33:16 AM
Last modified on 07/10/2014 at 07:53:12 AM
#759 closed defect (duplicate)
High memory usage on page with 390 iframes
| Reported by: | Gingerbread Man | Assignee: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Unknown | Milestone: | |
| Module: | Adblock-Plus-for-Firefox | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | greiner, mapx | Blocked By: | |
| Blocking: | Platform: | Firefox | |
| Ready: | no | Confidential: | no |
| Tester: | Verified working: | no | |
| Review URL(s): | |||
Description
Environment
Windows 7 x64 SP1 • Firefox 33.0a1 (2014-07-07) • Adblock Plus 2.6.3.3840
EasyPrivacy+List • Adblock Warning Removal List
How to reproduce
- Start a new instance of Firefox.
- Go to http://vimcolorschemetest.googlecode.com/svn/html/index-c.html
Observed behavior
With Adblock Plus enabled, the Firefox process uses about 1.4 GB of memory.
Expected behavior
With Adblock Plus disabled, the Firefox process uses about 360 MB of memory.
Forum post
https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=102521#p102521
Attachments (0)
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed on 07/08/2014 at 08:33:16 AM by greiner
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:2 follow-up: ↓ 4 Changed on 07/08/2014 at 08:57:20 AM by mapx
there are some troubles in chrome too ... high CPU, memory
comment:3 Changed on 07/08/2014 at 09:19:38 AM by mapx
- Cc greiner mapx added
comment:4 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed on 07/10/2014 at 04:58:49 AM by Gingerbread Man
Replying to mapx:
there are some troubles in chrome too ... high CPU, memory
I also get about 1.6 GB memory usage in Opera.
Replying to greiner:
Solutions for this issue are already being discussed at #521 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=988266
Both of those are specific to Firefox/Seamonkey/Thunderbird. Are there any tickets or third-party bug reports that apply to Chrome and Opera?
comment:5 Changed on 07/10/2014 at 07:53:12 AM by philll
We currently have #145 that Wladimir already mentioned in his blog post on memory consumption.
Solutions for this issue are already being discussed at #521 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=988266