Opened on 03/13/2014 at 05:02:52 PM
Closed on 05/02/2014 at 07:11:30 PM
#148 closed change (rejected)
[Typed objects] Implement fixed-size array types
Reported by: | trev | Assignee: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | P2 | Milestone: | |
Module: | Core | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
Blocking: | #145 | Platform: | |
Ready: | no | Confidential: | no |
Tester: | Verified working: | no | |
Review URL(s): |
Description
Background
See #145.
What to change
Fixed-size array types need to be implemented, all array entries should have the same type.
Attachments (0)
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed on 03/13/2014 at 05:08:16 PM by trev
- Blocking 150 added
comment:2 Changed on 03/14/2014 at 09:36:18 AM by trev
- Summary changed from [Typed objects] Implement array types to [Typed objects] Implement fixed-size array types
comment:3 Changed on 04/22/2014 at 07:37:03 PM by trev
- Blocking 150 removed
- Ready unset
- Resolution set to worksforme
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:4 Changed on 05/02/2014 at 07:11:21 PM by trev
- Resolution worksforme deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
comment:5 Changed on 05/02/2014 at 07:11:30 PM by trev
- Resolution set to rejected
- Status changed from reopened to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
After thinking a bit more about this, I don't see a real advantage in having both fixed-size and dynamically sized array types. Having #150 implemented should suffice.